Like, desire, plus the inhibition off view from intimate possibilities

Gonzaga, Grams. C., Haselton, Yards. Grams., Smurda, J., Davies, M. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Progression and you may People Decisions, 29(2), 119–126.

Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. M. (2000). The place regarding accessory from inside the peoples mating. Breakdown of General Therapy, 4(2), 186–204.

Kraut, Roentgen., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A good. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Societal Points, 58(1), 49–74.

Kraut, R., Patterson, Meters., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet sites paradox: A personal technical you to decreases societal engagement and you may mental better-becoming? Western Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.

Kreider, Roentgen.Meters., & Fields, J. M. (2001). Amount, time, and you will duration of marriage ceremonies and divorces. Most recent People Accounts, 70-80, (Arizona, DC: You.S. Census Agency, 2005).

Lemieux, R., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional data away from intimacy, welfare, and you will partnership: Assessment the fresh new presumptions of the triangular principle off like. Mental Reports, 90(step three,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.ninety.3.1009-1014

Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Age. (2004). Impression most useful regarding the undertaking worse: Public evaluations within this close dating. Journal away from Character and you will Public Therapy, 87(1), 80–95.

Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A great., & Gailliot, Meters. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: New implicit cognition regarding personal rivalry. Diary from Personality and Public Therapy, 97(1), 74–87.

A beneficial. (2001)mitment and you may relationship repairs components

Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. Good., & Gonzaga, G. C. (2008). Automated inattention in order to glamorous selection: The new changed psychology away from relationships fix. Progression and you will Human Decisions, 29(5), 343–349.

pold, B. E. (1981). Sequential study out-of disagreement and you can accord in disturb and you will nondistressed marital lovers. Log away from Consulting and you will Logical Mindset, 49(4), 554–567.

McKenna, K. Y. A great., Environmentally friendly, An excellent. S., Gleason, M. J. (2002). Relationship formation on line: What is the huge interest? Record off Personal Things, 58(1), 9–29.

The key benefits of self-confident illusions: Idealization additionally the structure of fulfillment during the close relationships

Neff, L. A great., & Karney, B. R. (2002). Self-comparison aim inside romantic matchmaking: A style of in the world enhancement and you will certain confirmation. Into the P. Noller & J. An effective. Feeney (Eds.), Expertise ents on the study of few correspondence (pp. 32–58). Nyc, NY: Cambridge School Force.

Obegi, J. H. (2008). The development of the customer-therapist thread through the contact lens from attachment idea. Psychotherapy: Concept, Browse, Habit, Education, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330

Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The newest public keeping track of program: Enhanced susceptibility so you’re able to social signs given that a transformative response to social exception to this rule. Inside K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The newest personal outcast: Ostracism, public exception to this rule, getting rejected, and intimidation (pp. 213–226). New york, NY: Psychology Force.

Enter, T., & Lydon, J. Elizabeth. (2001). All over the world and you may particular relational models throughout the experience of public relationships. Diary from Character and you can Personal Therapy, 80(4), 613–631.

Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. An excellent., Tran, S., ). Connection and you will suggestions trying to during the close matchmaking. Identity and you can Public Psychology Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.

Ross, L. R., & Spinner, B. (2001). General and you may particular connection representations inside the adulthood: Can there be a love?. Journal Of Social And personal Dating, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001

Rusbult, C. E., Olsen, Letter., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. In J. Harvey & A beneficial. Wenzel (Eds.), Intimate romantic relationships: Repairs and improvement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Schul, Y., & Vinokur, A beneficial. D. (2000). Projection directly impact certainly partners because the a purpose of the latest similarity within common knowledge. Identity And you will Personal Mindset Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008

Seligman, C., Fazio, Roentgen. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1980). Outcomes of salience off extrinsic advantages with the liking and you will enjoying. Record regarding Character and Social Psychology, 38(3), 453–460.

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse e-mail ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *